Page 61 of 104 FirstFirst ... 11515253545556575859606162636465666768697071 ... LastLast
Results 1,801 to 1,830 of 3096

Thread: Semi official cool old Indy car pics thread

  1. #1801

  2. #1802
    Uncle Jacques

  3. #1803
    More Chet Fillip

  4. #1804

  5. #1805

  6. #1806
    Desire Wilson

  7. #1807
    Registered User MD-IRLFAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Maryland USA
    Posts
    3,521
    Quote Originally Posted by Rick Jones

    Isn't this the Eagle that had been assigned to Michael Chandler, and Cogan replaced Chandler after Chandler had a career ending crash in T3 on fast Friday? If I remember correctly the car Chandler had been driving had a maroon paint scheme. What is Dubonnet? Wasn't that the sponsor on the ill fated Liger cars about this same point in time?
    Does that say Pontiac?
    To a New Yorker like yourself, a hero is some type of weird sandwich. Not some nut who takes on three Tigers!

  8. #1808
    I live for May in Indy! Rick Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Less than 30 minutes from IMS.
    Posts
    3,321
    Quote Originally Posted by MD-IRLFAN
    Does that say Pontiac?
    Yup. This is the point in time when Dan Gurney was very vocal about stock blocks versus turbocharged engines. He put his words into practice and fielded cars that did not run the status quo turbo Cosworths. In 1981 Gurney had Mike Mosley on the front row at Indy in a stock block Chevy, the Pepsi Challenger. Mosley dropped out of the 500 early but the following week he won at Milwaukee starting at the rear.
    God speed!

  9. #1809
    Quote Originally Posted by Rick Jones
    Yup. This is the point in time when Dan Gurney was very vocal about stock blocks versus turbocharged engines. He put his words into practice and fielded cars that did not run the status quo turbo Cosworths. In 1981 Gurney had Mike Mosley on the front row at Indy in a stock block Chevy, the Pepsi Challenger. Mosley dropped out of the 500 early but the following week he won at Milwaukee starting at the rear.
    It was his lone success. Most of the time the engines blew early and often. At Indy in '82 the team went through so many engines they couldn't make a qualifying attempt. After the '84 season Gurney's sponsors demanded a conventional car with a Cossie.
    The Ayn Rand of Indycar

    No one had to badge the Offy.

  10. #1810
    Unofficial Historian Michael Ferner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Bitburg, Germany
    Posts
    454
    Quote Originally Posted by freesaltwalther
    Howdy
    Kid: "When I grow up, I wanna be a race driver!"
    Howdy: "--- Huh?"

  11. #1811
    Quote Originally Posted by freesaltwalther
    Ongais
    I thought that was Dean Stockwell

  12. #1812
    Been at Indy since 1956! ZOOOM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Plainfield, Il.
    Posts
    4,232
    Quote Originally Posted by DaveL
    It was his lone success. Most of the time the engines blew early and often. At Indy in '82 the team went through so many engines they couldn't make a qualifying attempt. After the '84 season Gurney's sponsors demanded a conventional car with a Cossie.
    Hey Dave...
    What about Gurney's second places with the stock blocks?
    That doesn't count as a success?
    ZOOOM
    "Doc, just set them fingers sose I can hold the wheel"
    James Hurtubise, June, 1964

  13. #1813
    Quote Originally Posted by ZOOOM
    Hey Dave...
    What about Gurney's second places with the stock blocks?
    That doesn't count as a success?
    ZOOOM
    What, that it held together for the whole race without blowing? I guess you can call that success. Looking at the bigger picture, instead of isolated races, the NA stock block efforts were a collective failure.

  14. #1814
    The Ladder Broke in 74
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    soon to be Obamastan
    Posts
    12,255
    Quote Originally Posted by DaveL
    What, that it held together for the whole race without blowing? I guess you can call that success. Looking at the bigger picture, instead of isolated races, the NA stock block efforts were a collective failure.
    and sounded like chit
    But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security

  15. #1815
    Insider
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Elmira, Taiwan, Elmira...
    Posts
    10,897
    Quote Originally Posted by DaveL
    It was his lone success. Most of the time the engines blew early and often. At Indy in '82 the team went through so many engines they couldn't make a qualifying attempt. After the '84 season Gurney's sponsors demanded a conventional car with a Cossie.
    But, you're forgetting:

    In addition to Mosley's win, Goeff Brabham SHOULD have won at Riverside. Only a crossthreaded lugnut put him out. Rocky Moran SHOULD have won at Watkins Glen, except his crew waved him out prematurely at the last pit stop. He ran out of fuel four laps from the end. At Michigan, Mosley led with no problems until he missed a shift on a restart. They finished on 7 cylinders, but it was later discovered that only a plug wire had fallen off. At Mexico, Brabham qualified 2nd and finished 9th after repairs to a 1st lap accident. That's another 4 races that they should have won that season.

    Also, in '82 they ran a turbo stock block. This wasn't the same engine that they ran previously. What happened was that the wastegate settings gave them problems. In Gurney's words: "We would either have no power coming off the corner and good power at the end of the straightaway, or we would have really good power coming off the corner and be over boosting and over speeding the blower and everything else at the other end..."

    AAR did run a Cosworth in '83, but it was as a result of Gurney's partnership with Rick Galles. The '84 car was an aluminum Pontiac, but in '85 they used Cosworths because Gurney felt that the new rules killed the competitiveness of the stock block.

  16. #1816
    Insider
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Elmira, Taiwan, Elmira...
    Posts
    10,897
    Quote Originally Posted by BSJracing
    and sounded like chit
    You know, even a Bulldog would look pretty if it turned in fast laps...

  17. #1817
    Quote Originally Posted by flatlander_48
    But, you're forgetting:

    In addition to Mosley's win, Goeff Brabham SHOULD have won at Riverside. Only a crossthreaded lugnut put him out. Rocky Moran SHOULD have won at Watkins Glen, except his crew waved him out prematurely at the last pit stop. He ran out of fuel four laps from the end. At Michigan, Mosley led with no problems until he missed a shift on a restart. They finished on 7 cylinders, but it was later discovered that only a plug wire had fallen off. At Mexico, Brabham qualified 2nd and finished 9th after repairs to a 1st lap accident. That's another 4 races that they should have won that season.
    Would, coulda, shoulda. At the end of the day the NA stock blocks had a terrible finishing percentage relative to the Cosworths.

    The '84 car was an aluminum Pontiac, but in '85 they used Cosworths because Gurney felt that the new rules killed the competitiveness of the stock block.
    What new rules? Any rule changes over the years for the Cosworths and other 4 camers cut boost. If anything the NA stock blocks got an increase in displacement before all was said and done.

  18. #1818
    Found a few more early 70's older brother shots. Not sure who some of them are?
    David.






  19. #1819

  20. #1820

  21. #1821

  22. #1822

  23. #1823

  24. #1824

  25. #1825
    The #61 is Lee Brayton's car. The #99 is a Joe Hunt Magneto entry. Neither car made the race.

  26. #1826
    Quote Originally Posted by Ovalmeister
    Found a few more early 70's older brother shots. Not sure who some of them are?
    David.
    Well, if you don't know who THIS is, you haven't been around here very long

    "Only a fool fights in a burning house."-Kang

    "If you listen to fools....The Maaahhhhb Ruuuules....."-Ronnie James Dio

  27. #1827
    Snarky as ever
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    in front of my laptop.
    Posts
    9,619
    Blog Entries
    2
    Judging by the gold helmet Harkey is in the Joe Hunt #99.

    Dallenbach is in the Lindsey Hopkins #10 that eventually was bumped.

    Art Pollard in the STP #40 Lola.

    Dick Simon in his #44 along side, my guess, Cale Yarborogh.

  28. #1828
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    knoxville tennessee
    Posts
    1,300
    Quote Originally Posted by grogg
    Judging by the gold helmet Harkey is in the Joe Hunt #99.

    Dallenbach is in the Lindsey Hopkins #10 that eventually was bumped.

    Art Pollard in the STP #40 Lola.

    Dick Simon in his #44 along side, my guess, Cale Yarborogh.
    Didn't Art break his leg in a crash in the #40? IIRC, Wally replaced him for the race.
    Please visit the tribute to my longtime friend Mel Kenyon

  29. #1829
    Quote Originally Posted by Sea Fury
    Well, if you don't know who THIS is, you haven't been around here very long
    I knew that was Herk, the 99 I kinda figured was Harkey, the 14 is maybe McCluskey? The others I had problems with. I was 6 or 7 years old at the time. Does that Herk 56 still exist? Would love to see it in person.
    David.

  30. #1830
    Been at Indy since 1956! ZOOOM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Plainfield, Il.
    Posts
    4,232
    Quote Originally Posted by DaveL
    What, that it held together for the whole race without blowing? I guess you can call that success. Looking at the bigger picture, instead of isolated races, the NA stock block efforts were a collective failure.
    I know it wasn't Indy but didn't Dan run stock blocks at Riverside for a couple of wins?
    I'd have to say they won more than the Novi's or the turbines!


    ZOOOM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •