When will the doom and gloom go full throttle - again.
When will the doom and gloom go full throttle - again.
Witnessed Mario's "Miracle at Indy"...Watched 3 win their 4th Indy 500...Was there for Petty's 200th win...Saw the last Novi qualify
Interesting that there was more attention paid by the media to what MIGHT have happened on the coast than what DID happen inland from Irene.
Center Grove Trojans
2008 5A Football State Champs
2011 Track State Champs
Where's the official thread?
It's a Hoosier thing, you wouldn't understand...
It's relevance is directly tied to it's approach to the Bad Apple.......
People complaining about the media has gotten almost as tiring as the media itself.
"The number of threads by one poster in the OT is getting a little out of hand, IMHO. "
"In the land of freedom we are held hostage by the tyranny of political correctness...If we speak..we say it the wrong way; if we do not speak we are cowards…."
No kidding. The media have serious problems, but in this case, Irene caused 45+ deaths and $7 billion+ in damage. Some of the major metros got the bulk of the attention and weathered the storm quite well, but Irene caused great amounts of chaos in several places removed from the metros. I pointed out in another thread that a storm doesn't have to be an Andrew or a Katrina in order to be an extremely serious threat.
That said, I've read a couple post-mortems about Irene that I found interesting. In summary, it seems our ability to predict the path of tropical storms is strong, and the timing of the storms is pretty good -- but the ability to predict the intensity of the storms hasn't improved in decades. In other words, when your job is to predict the future, the product is necessarily going to have a great deal of uncertainty with it. And you can't wait until the worst-case scenario happens to start reporting on it.
Cancer sucks.
Agree completely. This hurricane did plenty of damage, just not in the most populated areas. People were so ready for the coast to get demolished that all the inland damage has seemed more minor than it was. My brother just got power back last night and he is in Maine where they didn't really get a lot of damage.
To be fair, "the media" would get killed if a hurricane pounded a population center like NY and every outlet didn't have a strong presence there. Several years ago, an F4/F5 (there was some debate and I don't recall the final number...I think 4) tornado blew through my hometown about ten miles south of where I live now. The next day several of the network news broadcasts originated from there and all of them had significant coverage of the area and the rest of WI that had been pounded. The next day, they were gone and the storm only got a few brief mentions nationally after that. Had that tornado hit a major metro area it would have had coverage for weeks. The difference in coverage is completely reasonable based on the number of people impacted. Heck, I was surprised to see camera crews (and anchors) in the area.
Bookmarks