Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Why two blowers instead of one (not sure if right forum)

  1. #1

    Why two blowers instead of one (not sure if right forum)

    Was processing some pics from last summer this morning and found this guy. What is the thought flow behind siamese blowers. I know some cars use a small/big turbo to try and offset power band inequalties, but have no idea about the dual blowers, is just to do something different?

    .....every dog was born free to live, even if it means dying.

    fav car pics
    http://s197.photobucket.com/albums/a...%20car%20pics/

  2. #2
    Waiting for the next race KenK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    225 Miles from Indianapolis Motor Speedway
    Posts
    1,310
    That's the old Magnuson unit. I believe the idea was to have the capacity of a GMC-type blower
    in an under-the-hood package, when used with two Weber DCOE sidedraft carbs. These came out
    in the early-to-mid 1980's. They bolt on to a standard 4V Holley flange pattern intake manifold.
    "It is a besetting vice of democracies to substitute public opinion for law. This is the usual form in which masses of men exhibit their tyranny." - James Fenimore Cooper

    "One man with courage is a majority." - Thomas Jefferson

  3. #3
    Wouldn't smaller mass spool up faster? So if two smaller ones moved the same amoumt of air as one large one, wouldn't they spool up faster?
    All rides are bought. But occasionally the currency is talent.

  4. #4
    A friend of Hal. midtown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    West Allis (via Indy)
    Posts
    14,052
    Blog Entries
    1
    Because it's kewl.
    It's a Hoosier thing, you wouldn't understand...

  5. #5
    Waiting for the next race KenK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    225 Miles from Indianapolis Motor Speedway
    Posts
    1,310
    ventman

    Wouldn't smaller mass spool up faster? So if two smaller ones moved the same amount of air as one large one, wouldn't they spool up faster?
    Well, since these are belt-driven, I don't think "spool-up" is the correct term. In any event, the
    weight of the impellers is nowhere near the weight of the crankshaft & flywheel. I don't see the
    weight of the impellers significantly affecting how quickly the engine revs.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by KenK View Post
    Well, since these are belt-driven, I don't think "spool-up" is the correct term. In any event, the
    weight of the impellers is nowhere near the weight of the crankshaft & flywheel. I don't see the
    weight of the impellers significantly affecting how quickly the engine revs.

    Yeah, I was thinking of exhaust driven turbochargers, not superchargers.

  7. #7
    CMF rrrr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    None of your business
    Posts
    14,728
    Quote Originally Posted by KenK View Post
    I don't see the weight of the impellers significantly affecting how quickly the engine revs.
    The amount of air moved by the blower can create a huge amount of resistance...it's estimated the blower on a top fuel/funny car engine uses about 1,000 HP of the engine's power.

    The Whipple quad rotor blower system is popular in big power boat engines...


  8. #8
    Waiting for the next race KenK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    225 Miles from Indianapolis Motor Speedway
    Posts
    1,310
    The amount of air moved by the blower can create a huge amount of resistance...it's estimated the blower on a top fuel/funny car engine uses about 1,000 HP of the engine's power.
    True. No free lunch.

  9. #9
    Insider
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Elmira, Taiwan, Elmira...
    Posts
    10,897
    Quote Originally Posted by abuseddog View Post
    Was processing some pics from last summer this morning and found this guy. What is the thought flow behind siamese blowers. I know some cars use a small/big turbo to try and offset power band inequalties, but have no idea about the dual blowers, is just to do something different?
    Since this is a street rod, I would think that it's more about visual impact rather than making horsepower. If you want to make maximum horsepower, you need to make sure that you have sufficient air flow all through the rev range. I think it would take an awefully big engine to need more air flow than an 8-71 could put out.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •