Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 70

Thread: The Turbogate Saga Continues...........

  1. #1

    The Turbogate Saga Continues...........

    Chevy has appealed the appeal ruling in Honda's favor...per Jenna Fryer tweet.

    Chevy has won 4 races. Honda zilch.

    Is Chevy that worried about Indy?
    "Any time that I can be out at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway, you're going to see a smile on my face." - Dan Wheldon

    "It's crazy how the Indianapolis Motor Speedway can make you so emotional. I went from the highest of highs to the lowest of lows in less than 24 hours." - Alex Tagliani

  2. #2
    Registered User dwaldrep51's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    my Indiana home
    Posts
    2,396
    I guess this isn't going to stop until it reaches the U.S. Supreme Court

  3. #3
    Member #66 jandj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Williamsburg,Va USA
    Posts
    7,572
    Quote Originally Posted by Doyouloveit? View Post
    Chevy has appealed the appeal ruling in Honda's favor...per Jenna Fryer tweet.

    Chevy has won 4 races. Honda zilch.

    Is Chevy that worried about Indy?
    I'd say not so much "worry" as "insurance".
    "Duty is the most sublime word in our language. Do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, you should never wish to do less" - R.E.Lee

  4. #4
    Pop-Off Valve Grizzlor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    11,140
    All Penske can complain about is he wasn't told in advance. Get over it.
    Wanker!

  5. #5
    I just want 1994 back. Formula Indy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Carmel IN
    Posts
    2,142
    This is ridiculous. The turbo is a series spec part, not an manufacturer part. From the very beginning they were going to make the singles and twins as similar as possible. What could they be having issues with?
    "I would like to be able to admire a person's opinions as I would their dog - without being expected to take it home with me." ---- Frank A. Clark
    " it only makes sense for the world's most prestigious fried chicken to pair up with the world's most prestigious watch brand" ---D. Byrd

  6. #6
    Insider AFColt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Noblesville, IN
    Posts
    4,948
    Blog Entries
    11
    Well, maybe Chevy will win the appeal of their appeal, then Honda can appeal the appeal of that appeal.
    IndyCar Advocate: A blog about enjoying the best sport in the world! Stop on by!
    --
    On Twitter as @indycaradvocate

  7. #7
    Drummer for JOKER Band irlracingfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Lake Havasu City, AZ
    Posts
    3,142
    I have to admit that the greed of Roger Penske is starting to **** me off. He's won every friggin' race this year! What the hell does it take to satisfy him?
    INDYCAR... Home of the BEST RACING on the planet!

  8. #8
    Registered User Glenn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Chandler, Arizona
    Posts
    3,793
    OK, here's the rub. Chevy (Penske) was not aware of the verbal agreement that they would allow the turbos to be tweaked. Chevy (Penske) looked at the 2 choices: single turbo and twin turbo. They knew the single turbo would spool up slower but would most likely be the best on the super speedways. Here's the kicker. They took a close look at the compressor map on the single turbo and saw that it would run most of it's time in a very inefficient part of the map. So seeing that the single was not well matched to the engine, they chose the twin turbos. Meanwhile Honda got a verbal agreement to tweak the single turbo and the other manufacturers didn't know about this agreement. That last part is speculation on my part, if they knew about it, then too bad, but if they didn't know about it, they have a legitimate gripe.

  9. #9
    Pop-Off Valve Grizzlor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    11,140
    Quote Originally Posted by Formula Indy View Post
    This is ridiculous. The turbo is a series spec part, not an manufacturer part. From the very beginning they were going to make the singles and twins as similar as possible. What could they be having issues with?
    This was agreed on early on. Honda submitted the discrepancy in 2011, and eventually Borg Warner got them the new turbo. All Penske is pissed about is that he wasn't informed.

  10. #10
    Registered User Darth Airbox's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    3,549
    Quote Originally Posted by AFColt View Post
    Well, maybe Chevy will win the appeal of their appeal, then Honda can appeal the appeal of that appeal.
    True story

  11. #11
    Curse you darkness! crispy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    29 Land
    Posts
    15,090
    A professional racing series does not do "verbal agreements".

    If, in fact, the questions were raised during the selection process, the question would be answered in written form and given to all parties.

    In a professional racing series...
    Ain't engine competition grand?

  12. #12
    Registered User Darth Airbox's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    3,549
    Quote Originally Posted by crispy View Post
    A professional racing series does not do "verbal agreements".

    If, in fact, the questions were raised during the selection process, the question would be answered in written form and given to all parties.

    In a professional racing series...
    Can you name any racing series that doesn't have shenanigans? I doubt there is a single series on the planet that passes that test.

  13. #13
    American Patriot
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Sylvania, OH USA
    Posts
    1,645
    This wasn't a "verbal agreement".....it was a "Verbal notification"----Indycar told them they would match turbos if it became evident there was a single vs twin discrepancy. Professional racing series change rules all the time---written or unwritten, between seasons or in season. This is a non issue unless you are Penske, a Penske fan, or a Penske enabler.
    ...and if you want a little peace, sometimes you gotta fight. You gotta walk throught the darkness before you stand in the light. Sammy Hagar.

  14. #14
    Insider AFColt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Noblesville, IN
    Posts
    4,948
    Blog Entries
    11
    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Airbox View Post
    Can you name any racing series that doesn't have shenanigans? I doubt there is a single series on the planet that passes that test.
    No, every other form of racing on the planet never has issues such as this pop up. EVER.

  15. #15
    Ellis/ IndyCar Dead to Me Swaze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    2,174
    This whole "turbo gate" saga is just another example of what a selfish egomaniac Roger Penske is and how he always puts himself ahead of the sport.

    You gotta love the audacity of Roger and sense of entitlement. His team has won all 4 races to start the season and Will Power is just dominating........and yet Roger wants to run his mouth like he's the victim. This is what happens when success goes to your head and you literally think the entire world revolves around you. It's been that way for years with Penske (he basically controls whatever series he is in)

    Let us all remember that Roger Penske did not want a new car/engine in 2012 and let us all remember that Roger Penske is also the reason we don't have aero-kits in 2012.

    Every time I justifiably talk trash about Penske's selfish actions, inevitably somebody will respond with how many races or how many Indy 500's he has won and how successful of an operation he runs (as if I don't know this). I've never questioned his success or his know how on running team. He runs a first-class operation, hires good people, and does his homework.........so all of his wins are well earned. What I do question is his sense of entitlement and how he always (and I repeat ALWAYS) puts himself ahead of the sport.

    I know this is hard for some people to understand, but you can be very successful and yet still be a selfish, arrogant, hypocrite. You can be very successful but also detrimental to your sport. You can be very successful and yet be ungrateful for what you've accomplished (always wanting more to a point of excess).

    Bottom line is that Penske just needs to shut up and Randy needs to publicly tell him to shut up. I know that's hard to do and even harder for Roger to take as his entire career he's almost always been told "Yes...Sir"
    **** This Sport

  16. #16
    Resident of the NE Vista Mario4ever's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    3 miles west of IMS
    Posts
    3,772
    Quote Originally Posted by Swaze View Post
    This whole "turbo gate" saga is just another example of what a selfish egomaniac Roger Penske is and how he always puts himself ahead of the sport.

    You gotta love the audacity of Roger and sense of entitlement. His team has won all 4 races to start the season and Will Power is just dominating........and yet Roger wants to run his mouth like he's the victim. This is what happens when success goes to your head and you literally think the entire world revolves around you. It's been that way for years with Penske (he basically controls whatever series he is in)

    Let us all remember that Roger Penske did not want a new car/engine in 2012 and let us all remember that Roger Penske is also the reason we don't have aero-kits in 2012.

    Every time I justifiably talk trash about Penske's selfish actions, inevitably somebody will respond with how many races or how many Indy 500's he has won and how successful of an operation he runs (as if I don't know this). I've never questioned his success or his know how on running team. He runs a first-class operation, hires good people, and does his homework.........so all of his wins are well earned. What I do question is his sense of entitlement and how he always (and I repeat ALWAYS) puts himself ahead of the sport.

    I know this is hard for some people to understand, but you can be very successful and yet still be a selfish, arrogant, hypocrite. You can be very successful but also detrimental to your sport. You can be very successful and yet be ungrateful for what you've accomplished (always wanting more to a point of excess).

    Bottom line is that Penske just needs to shut up and Randy needs to publicly tell him to shut up. I know that's hard to do and even harder for Roger to take as his entire career he's almost always been told "Yes...Sir"
    Lots to agree with in this post.
    "If you wait, all that happens is you get older" - Mario Andretti

  17. #17
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Carmel, IN
    Posts
    467
    Quote Originally Posted by Glenn View Post
    OK, here's the rub. Chevy (Penske) was not aware of the verbal agreement that they would allow the turbos to be tweaked. Chevy (Penske) looked at the 2 choices: single turbo and twin turbo. They knew the single turbo would spool up slower but would most likely be the best on the super speedways. Here's the kicker. They took a close look at the compressor map on the single turbo and saw that it would run most of it's time in a very inefficient part of the map. So seeing that the single was not well matched to the engine, they chose the twin turbos. Meanwhile Honda got a verbal agreement to tweak the single turbo and the other manufacturers didn't know about this agreement. That last part is speculation on my part, if they knew about it, then too bad, but if they didn't know about it, they have a legitimate gripe.
    ^^^ This

    The "agreement" wasn't part of the official recorded notes of the meeting...it was just on some notepads that were kept by participants at the meetings. Also, it was a meeting before Chevy thought about participating in the series, so they weren't present to hear about it. There was no way for Chevy (Roger) to know this was a possibility. So without knowing, they built an engine they felt would be more efficient. However, if they knew the turbo's could be changed, they might have chosen the single turbo instead.

    I think there's a legitimate complaint.

  18. #18
    The Ladder Broke in 74
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    soon to be Obamastan
    Posts
    12,240
    Quote Originally Posted by AFColt View Post
    Well, maybe Chevy will win the appeal of their appeal, then Honda can appeal the appeal of that appeal.
    Well unless Penske goes for a 2002 ruling, then of course it's not appealable
    But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security

  19. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by irlracingfan View Post
    I have to admit that the greed of Roger Penske is starting to **** me off. He's won every friggin' race this year! What the hell does it take to satisfy him?
    How do you know Andretti isn't behind this? Or Kalkhoven? Why is Roger getting singled out?
    "Try some of these before or after your statements if you are not presenting them as facts. Things like - "In my opinion", or "I think that", JHMO, IMHO, IMO, JMO... Your opinions are not (necessarily) fact. That would clear things up some." - Seadog 03/25/2010 11:40am So the above is JMO.

  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by Swaze View Post
    This whole "turbo gate" saga is just another example of what a selfish egomaniac Roger Penske is and how he always puts himself ahead of the sport.

    You gotta love the audacity of Roger and sense of entitlement. His team has won all 4 races to start the season and Will Power is just dominating........and yet Roger wants to run his mouth like he's the victim. This is what happens when success goes to your head and you literally think the entire world revolves around you. It's been that way for years with Penske (he basically controls whatever series he is in)

    Let us all remember that Roger Penske did not want a new car/engine in 2012 and let us all remember that Roger Penske is also the reason we don't have aero-kits in 2012.

    Every time I justifiably talk trash about Penske's selfish actions, inevitably somebody will respond with how many races or how many Indy 500's he has won and how successful of an operation he runs (as if I don't know this). I've never questioned his success or his know how on running team. He runs a first-class operation, hires good people, and does his homework.........so all of his wins are well earned. What I do question is his sense of entitlement and how he always (and I repeat ALWAYS) puts himself ahead of the sport.

    I know this is hard for some people to understand, but you can be very successful and yet still be a selfish, arrogant, hypocrite. You can be very successful but also detrimental to your sport. You can be very successful and yet be ungrateful for what you've accomplished (always wanting more to a point of excess).

    Bottom line is that Penske just needs to shut up and Randy needs to publicly tell him to shut up. I know that's hard to do and even harder for Roger to take as his entire career he's almost always been told "Yes...Sir"
    Why shouldn't he put himself ahead of the sport? He competes to win. He's a participant plain and simple. Why is his issue any different than the issue the Honda teams have? Why aren't you singling out the guys from Honda that have complained? Why isn't Ganassi being accused of putting himself ahead of the sport?

  21. #21
    Registered User goldie19's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Speedway, In
    Posts
    7,779
    And let's put the lack of communication squarely where it belongs....Tony Cottman

    His side conversation, his toes (that were ot turned in)

    Imagine the bile if Barnhart were involved
    "I think there's only so many people that can take care of themselves, and can take care of other people. And the rest of the people … they're useful in terms of compost for the whole planet, you know." - Bill Murray

  22. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by Doyouloveit? View Post
    Chevy has appealed the appeal ruling in Honda's favor...per Jenna Fryer tweet.

    Chevy has won 4 races. Honda zilch.

    Is Chevy that worried about Indy?
    you mean they've "strenuously objected"?

  23. #23
    So, is Roger that sure a Honda powered car is going to beat him at Indy? This is what it sounds like to me.

  24. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by Grizzlor View Post
    All Penske can complain about is he wasn't told in advance. Get over it.
    where is jenna's reference to penske?

  25. #25
    Weet alles Miguel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Netherlands/Germany
    Posts
    1,152
    This is what happens when you have no clear rules written down. What a mess.
    MotorRacingblog.nl | Kwaliteitsblog

  26. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by Glenn View Post
    OK, here's the rub. Chevy (Penske) was not aware of the verbal agreement that they would allow the turbos to be tweaked. Chevy (Penske) looked at the 2 choices: single turbo and twin turbo. They knew the single turbo would spool up slower but would most likely be the best on the super speedways. Here's the kicker. They took a close look at the compressor map on the single turbo and saw that it would run most of it's time in a very inefficient part of the map. So seeing that the single was not well matched to the engine, they chose the twin turbos. Meanwhile Honda got a verbal agreement to tweak the single turbo and the other manufacturers didn't know about this agreement. That last part is speculation on my part, if they knew about it, then too bad, but if they didn't know about it, they have a legitimate gripe.

    glenn, using this argument....remove the 50 or 80# of ballast. lotus/judd built a light engine, maybe seeing the excessive rear weight of the car (maybe not) and weight was added.

  27. #27
    Registered User Glenn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Chandler, Arizona
    Posts
    3,793
    Quote Originally Posted by ndcrs View Post
    glenn, using this argument....remove the 50 or 80# of ballast. lotus/judd built a light engine, maybe seeing the excessive rear weight of the car (maybe not) and weight was added.
    What I have never understood was if Lotus was under the original weight spec or not? Or did they raise the spec weight when Honda and Chevy complained? If the latter is correct, then the Lotus guys should file a claim.

  28. #28
    Registered User milliesdad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    a state of Vicodin-induced confusion
    Posts
    1,231
    Quote Originally Posted by AFColt View Post
    Well, maybe Chevy will win the appeal of their appeal, then Honda can appeal the appeal of that appeal.
    I like bnanas because they have apeal
    "If there are no dogs in Heaven, when I die I want to go where they go" Mark Twain

  29. #29
    I just want 1994 back. Formula Indy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Carmel IN
    Posts
    2,142
    Someone at Honda must have really pissed him off.

  30. #30
    A friend of Hal. midtown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    West Allis (via Indy)
    Posts
    14,036
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by ndcrs View Post
    you mean they've "strenuously objected"?
    You can't handle the truth.
    It's a Hoosier thing, you wouldn't understand...

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •