I'm seeing today there a 1-2-3 8-9-10 for Honda.
They're back.
I'm seeing today there a 1-2-3 8-9-10 for Honda.
They're back.
We drive 800 miles every year to see them go 500 miles. And we're glad to do it.
If you can call that a race.
Not in every thread, please. This one's about Honda's performance. Ther's already a BI thread or two going
Thanks!
"The series may be hesitant to say it, but the day is here for everybody that loves IndyCar racing to link arms and help each other out. Anybody who doesn’t want to do that needs to find something else to do with their time.”
-- Eddie Gossage, President, Texas Motor Speedway, ICONIC Advisory Committee & TrackForum member
Rahal was surprisingly fast for using a first spec homologated engine. His first engine was replaced before the engine pool was filled with the new spec engines. He has quite a few more miles before he becomes eligible for a replacement sans penalty.
Honda is "back"? Of course they are... They received a performance increase from a new turb via a gift ruling and then injected a new engine into competition and saw a performance increase on both.
Awful shrude on their part. Good for fans of Honda teams and drivers. Bad for fans of Chevy drivers and teams. Certainly has other potential negatives as well that time will reveal.
I agree they are back, but the top 10 finishing order looked like a random selection among two engines. Honda's actual order in the finish was:
1
2
6
9
10
Which means Chevy was
3
4
5
7
8
or put another way: HHCCCHCCHH
Where I come from there's no difference in the distribution of these finishing positions by engine type. Smells a lot like parity to me.
Sifaka
The more setup plays into it... the less the engine matters. Horsepower at the wheel doesn't mean as much when you can't apply all of it to the track without losing the back end or sliding into the wall.
Texas was a perfect solution to mitigate the poor decision making with the Turbos earlier this season.
Bookmarks