Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 61 to 75 of 75

Thread: A solution.....

  1. #61
    On vacation
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Rosy Fingered Dawn
    Posts
    1,567
    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Austin View Post
    For years I tried to be Mr. Sunshine around here ands that didn't accoplish anything. Everyone talked me out of it and convinced me that everything sucks. Now I'm just trying to fit in.

    We went through this before after I warned everyone. Seems everyone forgets just how right I was, and I'm gonna be right again this time too. I mean, I've only seen this happen over and over for the 50 years I've been following and been involved in racing of all types. The motors and the manufacturers always end up being the problem.

    Funny thing is, it's the disenfranchised cart/champcar fans that were so anxious to see the manufacturers and the new motors. Hell, it was the manufacturers that destroyed cart to begin with. Champcar fans know better, or at least they should by now. How's your series doing, eh? How'de that manufacturer pull out work for you guys? 240mph is great as long as the money doesn't dry up.



    I'm willing to let it play out, and complain the whole time, because I already know how it is going to end.
    When tobacco money dried up, teams left. Then the Hulmans open checkbook opened up even more for the IRL, then they shut that down and kicked TG to the curb.
    Engine manufactures destroyed CART? lol.
    Did multi engine manufactures destroy the irl?

    If multi engine manufactures destroy, then why is IC going down that road? And why did you say Honda itself bailed the IRL out? Because they could bury the leauge as well, right? Nope. They'd just bolt some motors in from CamKing's hands that he's touched.

  2. #62
    Ellis/ IndyCar Dead to Me Swaze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    2,174
    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Austin View Post
    The one thing that just might save us this time will be that it is one series, and just maybe there will be enough momentum to attract some good sponsorship and get the teams healthy. Then they can all get greedy again, stage a revolt and run their own series. There's that history repeating thing again, eh?
    No that's not history repeating itself. TG is the one who staged a revolt and started his own series. The IRL was created as result of the split not CART.

    That same creation of the IRL and open-wheel war is also what eventually caused Honda and Toyota to bail from CART because they wanted to race at Indy. If not for the split and open-wheel war who is to say they bail? What reason would they have had to bail if that reason didn't exist?

    By the way you still may be right they may end up screwing over the series and doing more harm than good a few years from now but you can't guarantee that. At best you have an educated guess and with new leadership this time around anything can happen.
    **** This Sport

  3. #63
    Quote Originally Posted by Swaze View Post
    No that's not history repeating itself. TG is the one who staged a revolt and started his own series.
    Remember 1979?

    If not for the split and open-wheel war who is to say they bail? What reason would they have had to bail if that reason didn't exist?
    Ask Toyota and chevrolet why they bailed on the IRL. I believe they cited high costs, but they were coincidentially getting blown out at the time too.

    By the way you still may be right they may end up screwing over the series and doing more harm than good a few years from now but you can't guarantee that.
    There are no guarantees, but history is as good an indicator as anything, especially when it repeats itself as many times as the manufacturers have bailed.


    At best you have an educated guess and with new leadership this time around anything can happen.
    God help us.
    "Is that my *** that I smell burning?" ... Helmet Stogie from "Death spasms of the Mabuchi"

  4. #64
    Quote Originally Posted by FlatOut View Post
    When tobacco money dried up, teams left.
    Use the search feature. I repeatedly told everyone that was coming too.

    Money is like crack. People can't quit until it is taken away from them, and then the withdrawal is hell.

    Engine manufactures destroyed CART? lol.
    They did their best. Without Gere and KK's checkbooks, plus Ford sticking around, champcar would have never gotten out of bankruptcy court.

    Did multi engine manufactures destroy the irl?
    They did their best, but Honda stuck around and kept us in good engines.

    If multi engine manufactures destroy, then why is IC going down that road?
    Because the current leader has been an auto racing fan for.... what .... two or three years? I'm not so sure he has a good working knowledge of the history of manufacturers coming and going.

    And why did you say Honda itself bailed the IRL out?
    I didn't say, but I would imagine they liked the idea of a captive field and the marketing opportunity. This time around they might stay after they blow everyone out, or they might not.

  5. #65
    Its Dutch
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Gackland
    Posts
    5,730
    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Austin View Post



    Ask Toyota and chevrolet why they bailed on the IRL. I believe they cited high costs, but they were coincidentially getting blown out at the time too.

    They bailed for many reasons. Way too expensive, for the ROI. Toyota and Chevy were more interested in NASCAR. Not enough eyeballs. Just a bad business deal to continue on with.
    Prime Minister of Gackland

  6. #66
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Chattanooga, TN
    Posts
    2,446
    Having manufacturers isn't what kills anything. Having them create a bespoke engine that has no relevance to any other racing they do and then limiting what engines are allowed and having asinine rules about engine badging, that is the type of horse**** that ruins a series. And it's not like the manufacturers should have any problems with racing against these types of engines. Honda and Chevy do it in the ALMS all the damn time. As big a fan as I am of Randy, and of the V6T's, this was a bad move on his part. They should have had a chassis formula, and an engine displacement limit, and invited anyone who wanted to build something to do so.
    "It takes a special level of incompetance to make a schedule this terrible. America is possibly the greatest country in the world overall for tracks. To make a bad schedule in America takes effort. A special kind of effort. A kind of effort that only IndyCar could come up with."

  7. #67
    and I am an IRLholic
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    5,048
    Doc, not questioning your wisdom. But consider some other reasons.

    Take F1. The manufacturers have been in and out of play over the decades. They owned teams and they sold teams. They produce engines. They rise and fall in participation and promotional spending. Yet F1 is arguably very successful. The reason has to a lot to do with a ruthless leader in King Bernie, but the real answer is a strong leader with a vision in place and that person drives the entire sport to new economic heights. The inclusion of manufacturers in IndyCar is good and bad. The way to make it good is to have a more dominant force in the league leadership. Has been and will continue to be the problem. Going back to Andrew Craig and up to Tony George, IndyCar has lacked an alpha leader to take charge of operations and development. Until someone is kicking ass and taking names on a regular basis, these side concerns about manufacturers will be seen as problems. Will Randy Bernard be that person? WE will see as he lines up the pieces he is putting together.
    “Jealousy is the tribute mediocrity pays to genius.” -- Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen

  8. #68
    Quote Originally Posted by Todd Gack View Post
    They bailed for many reasons. Way too expensive, for the ROI.
    Too expensive is always the convenient excuse. It's never too expensive when they are winning, is it?

  9. #69
    Its Dutch
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Gackland
    Posts
    5,730
    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Austin View Post
    Too expensive is always the convenient excuse. It's never too expensive when they are winning, is it?
    It is when its in a series they don't really care about to begin with.

  10. #70
    Registered User Jakester's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    12,830
    Too expensive is always the convenient excuse. It's never too expensive when they are winning, is it?
    Yes, sometimes it is. Peugot and WEC.
    new sig pending

  11. #71
    Quote Originally Posted by Jakester View Post
    Yes, sometimes it is. Peugot and WEC.
    That's not it all of it. Porsche is coming. You'de better believe they weighed that part out.

  12. #72
    Quote Originally Posted by Todd Gack View Post
    It is when its in a series they don't really care about to begin with.
    Manufacturers never care about any series they are in. That's why they always leave such a disaster behind them. They come in and splash money around as long as they are winning and getting a positive buzz, but when they start getting thumped they leave citing high costs.

    The best example is Chevrolet. They bailed on cart when they stopped winning and the same in the IRL. When they were winning there were promotional ads and everything, but once they couldn't keep up they didn't hang around long.

    The only manufacturer I have ever seen that demonstrated any sort of "care" about a series was Honda floating Indycar until they got some competition. Certainly they got paid, but I am not convinced they didn't lose money on that deal.

  13. #73
    Some guy with a red name.
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    3,044
    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Austin View Post
    Manufacturers never care about any series they are in. That's why they always leave such a disaster behind them. They come in and splash money around as long as they are winning and getting a positive buzz, but when they start getting thumped they leave citing high costs.
    Explain Peugeot leaving sports cars in January. They won lots of sports car races with the 908.

    Explain Renault leaving F1 in the mid 90s as an engine maker. They powered the WCC winning car from 1992-1997 and the WDC winning car every year during that time except for 1994.
    We drive 800 miles every year to see them go 500 miles. And we're glad to do it.

  14. #74
    Paradoxically Sublime Fool Turn13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Brownsburg, Indiana
    Posts
    31,108
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Austin View Post
    The only manufacturer I have ever seen that demonstrated any sort of "care" about a series was Honda floating Indycar until they got some competition.
    And yet Honda said they desired to have the competition.
    "Each day well lived makes every yesterday a dream of happiness and every tomorrow a vision of hope. Look well therefore to this one day for it, and it alone, is life"
    ~ Sanskrit poem attributed to Kalidasa, "Salutation to the Dawn"


    Brian's Wish

  15. #75
    Insider
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Oberbergischer Kreis, Deutschland
    Posts
    6,251
    Quote Originally Posted by Joonyah View Post
    Explain Peugeot leaving sports cars in January. They won lots of sports car races with the 908.

    Explain Renault leaving F1 in the mid 90s as an engine maker. They powered the WCC winning car from 1992-1997 and the WDC winning car every year during that time except for 1994.
    Also VW in the Dakar and Subaru, Mitsubishi and Peugeot in WRC.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •