Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 64

Thread: ESPN - ABC discussion

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    The fields I used to roam
    Posts
    15,454

    Re: Why

    Originally posted by hdolan
    Why was Defender's post 'ESPN Continues To Shoot Appendages Off " closed...
    I'm glad you asked, Howard. I only made the post because I think it's relevant to the hapless position in which the IRL finds itself with regard to ESPN.

    But as usual, Railbird attempted to derail the thread with a diversion that included a backhanded slam against Tony George, this time successfully. I think it's a shame adults can't have a conversation about a relevant topic.
    Last edited by Disciple; 10-04-2003 at 06:45 PM.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    175
    But it was on topic

    ABC/ESPN were heralded as hero's around here for signing that contract, and paying TG the "golden paycheck".

    Most here trumpeted it as a great thing, not paying attention to the fact, that ABC/ESPN was going to give open wheel racing the very same, if not worse treatment, than both CART and IRL fans were complaining about before.

    NOW, I see everyone not only NOT liking ABC/ESPN, but denying they ever said it was a good deal in the first place.

    The Revisionist History going on about this a classic one.

    TG signed the deal, and should have known what to expect. He sold the Indy 500 coverage, with the rest of the IRL season as "extra baggage".

  3. #3
    Future Insider
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Between the walls, just outside the groove
    Posts
    2,203
    TG signed the deal, and should have known what to expect.
    CART's tv coverage was a disaster... only a fool would believe the IRL's would have been any different.

    It is different... only worse.... now we have Arute and Jenkins sniping at the "loser" CART fans that might tune in to see Toyota, Honda, Penske, Ganassi, and a few of their formerly favorite gunning the throttle in the cockpit.

    And Scott Goodyear is no Parker Johnstone. Only another cheap imitation.

    If only Jason Priestly would come back to liven the show up a tad. At least he'd admit he didn't know what he was talking about.
    If it doesn't have wings... It isn't worth talking about!

  4. #4
    Paradoxically Sublime Turn13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Brownsburg, Indiana
    Posts
    30,886
    Blog Entries
    1
    I think it was a good idea then to lock down a network contract.

    I'd like to see Tony improve the production values, direction, auxiliary content of the programs, but I'm still glad they're on a network - any network - with the maximum potential viewers.

    CART's last three network races averaged 1.2 - that's about what the IRL averages for the entire season, including Indy and TT's.

    Quality can always improve. At least the IRL has the world's most exciting racing (and had the world's fastest race) available to the most viewers possible. Beats the heck out of the alternative of crappy races on a relatively unknown channel.
    "Each day well lived makes every yesterday a dream of happiness and every tomorrow a vision of hope. Look well therefore to this one day for it, and it alone, is life"
    ~ Sanskrit poem attributed to Kalidasa, "Salutation to the Dawn"


    Brian's Wish

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    The fields I used to roam
    Posts
    15,454
    Originally posted by El Mariachi
    ABC/ESPN were heralded as hero's around here for signing that contract, and paying TG the "golden paycheck".
    No one praised ABC/ESPN. I stated I thought it was great the networks bought into the IRL for long term coverage. I expressed the hope at that time their coverage would improve.

    Most around here trumpeted it as a great thing, not paying attention to the fact, that ABC/ESPN was going to give open wheel racing the very same, if not worse treatment, than both CART and IRL fans were complaining about before.
    Wrong. Most of us hoped the coverage would improve, particularly given the financial commitment ABC/ESPN made. It was significant enough to lead even the most skeptical to believe they would be serious.

    NOW, I see everyone not only NOT liking ABC/ESPN, but denying they ever said it was a good deal in the first place.
    The Revisionist History going on about this a classic one.
    You are making things up. Provide links if you'd like to be taken seriously. Pay attention. We said the IRL got a great deal. We hoped then, as now, the coverage would improve.

    TG signed the deal, and should have known what to expect. He sold the Indy 500 coverage, with the rest of the IRL season as "extra baggage".
    ABC and ESPN bought the rights to ALL the races, not just the one. To speculate that Tony 'should have known what to expect' shows a complete lack of understanding about fundamental television business concepts. You may be simply misinformed. Either way, What ABC and ESPN are delivering falls far short of fan and league expectations. Granted, the IRL could improve its lot in life with more effective promotion, but no one could have expected the depth to which the Disney corporate professionalism has fallen.
    Last edited by cleanupcrew; 10-04-2003 at 11:22 PM.

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Formerly-Gosport, Ind. Now-Arkansas
    Posts
    539
    It's no secret how poorly ABC/ESPN treated Cart during that series tenure at those networks. I find it simply amazing that someone (Tony George) would sign a long term contract with a network with such a history without providing some performance clauses to protect my league from exactly what's happening. To do anything other than that would be foolish. Unless Mr. George had an "out" clause written into the contract, I can't see where the league is going to get anything other than more than the same.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    The fields I used to roam
    Posts
    15,454
    At the time ABC/ESPN tossed c^rt out, it would seem logical that ABC/ESPN might instead turn their attention to the IRL, particularly since NASCAR left.

    Logic does not, however, prevail where the Disney family o' politics is concerned.
    Last edited by cleanupcrew; 10-04-2003 at 11:23 PM.

  8. #8
    H H A
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Indpls, Ind,
    Posts
    9,005
    Logic does not, however, prevail where the Disney family o' politics is concerned.


    nor does it in some folk's backfilling revisionism.

  9. #9
    I like the coverage on ABC/ESPN/ESPN2.

    I like Page, Goodyear, Arute, etc.



    I don't like Tommy Kendall.

    But I do like Varsha.

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    The fields I used to roam
    Posts
    15,454
    I continue to seek intelligent conversation about the shenanigans going on at ESPN, IRL or otherwise, which was the original topic. More specifically, how they've now managed to honk off the cash cow they have left since NASCAR bid them adieu.

    How about keeping it on topic for a change?

    [see how clear that reads - and without unnecessary inflammatory adjectives]
    Last edited by cleanupcrew; 10-04-2003 at 11:28 PM.

  11. #11
    H H A
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Indpls, Ind,
    Posts
    9,005
    ABC acquired the broadcast rights to the Indianapolis 500 at a friendly rate by agreeing to air the remaining IRL events knowing the interest in openwheel racing in America has fallen steadily since the split.


    On topic?
    Last edited by cleanupcrew; 10-04-2003 at 11:30 PM.

  12. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    The fields I used to roam
    Posts
    15,454
    IF we come to some sort of rationalization that your statement is somehow true, then ABC/ESPN is even more stupid than I have already given them credit for.

    The most exciting racing on the planet is in the IRL, race after race. To waste that simply to broadcast the Indy 500 would be, well, idiotic...and that's being kind.

    What ABC/ESPN has heaped on the IRL is not 'partnership,' it's abuse.

    ESPN lost NASCAR but still stalks it like a groupie, and they have now made their other cash cow, the NFL, angry. It's no wonder the IRL gets treated badly by Disney.
    Last edited by doitagain; 10-04-2003 at 09:50 PM.

  13. #13
    Future Insider
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Between the walls, just outside the groove
    Posts
    2,203
    Originally posted by Defender
    The most exciting racing on the planet is in the IRL, race after race.
    Right now.. the viewers don't agree with you, and in fact are turning off "the most exciting racing on the planet". The IRL network numbers are down dramatically. Last figure I saw was over 15%.

  14. #14
    Originally posted by speedvis
    Right now.. the viewers don't agree with you, and in fact are turning off "the most exciting racing on the planet". The IRL network numbers are down dramatically. Last figure I saw was over 15%.
    More folks watch Jerry Springer than PBS too, I bet.

    So what?

  15. #15
    Future Insider
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Between the walls, just outside the groove
    Posts
    2,203
    PBS can put garbage out, and the government picks up the tab.

    The IRL doesn't have such an option.

  16. #16
    Originally posted by speedvis
    PBS can put garbage out, and the government picks up the tab.

    The IRL doesn't have such an option.
    I thought that the Brickyard 400 was bankrolling the IRL.

    That what folks on here keep telling me anyway.



    And what garbage shows are you thinking of on PBS?

    Don't you watch Red Green?


  17. #17
    Future Insider
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Between the walls, just outside the groove
    Posts
    2,203
    I've never said such a thing... but I do recognize it's all the same checkbook.

    PBS.... Can I get the old boring channels on a dish? Took me forever finding a college football game today on "basic" cable.

    If it ain't on the dish... I'm usually not watching.

  18. #18
    Originally posted by Defender
    IF we come to some sort of rationalization that your statement is somehow true, then ABC/ESPN is even more stupid than I have already given them credit for.

    The most exciting racing on the planet is in the IRL, race after race. To waste that simply to broadcast the Indy 500 would be, well, idiotic...and that's being kind.

    What ABC/ESPN has heaped on the IRL is not 'partnership,' it's abuse.

    ESPN lost NASCAR but still stalks it like a groupie, and they have now made their other cash cow, the NFL, angry. It's no wonder the IRL gets treated like badly by Disney.
    Geez, OK fender. We get the idea. They're failing to promote the most exciting form of racing since Moses tried to beat the pharoah's chariots across the Dead Sea. We've established, thanks to your constant bleating, that the mouse network isn't worthy to wipe the tenderloin crumbs off of Tonys lap after a snack in the pagoda.

    SOoooooooo... what are you going to do about it?? You're the guy who supposedly has the expertise in this field.

    Why don't you take your case to Tony George himself?? Hmmmm.... I believe he's the one running this league and is also the one with the most to gain by correcting all these deficiences in the Disney family of channels that you seem to love to point out every 5 minutes on this forum.
    Last edited by doitagain; 10-04-2003 at 09:48 PM.

  19. #19
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Killeen,Texas
    Posts
    626
    Defender,the "Rat"(as they call it in Orlando) upper brass does not see the IRL as you it. I am sure they want it grow,but they are not willing to put much effort into it. Besides,they are probably breaking even on the .7 races and the Indy 500. Look at the number of commercials that are shown,so I am sure they are making money on the IRL. So from Disney's point of view things are just fine.

  20. #20
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    The fields I used to roam
    Posts
    15,454
    Originally posted by trac-champ
    Why don't you take your case to Tony George himself?? Hmmmm.... I believe he's the one running this league and is also the one with the most to gain by correcting all these deficiences in the Disney family of channels that you seem to love to point out every 5 minutes on this forum.
    I have. In person and via written and electronic communication. I have also conducted meaningful dialogue with other personnel involved in the operation of the league about this problem. In most cases, they agree and are working to try and resolve this issue. I suggest others follow that tactic. You would be surprised how open to dialogue the IRL really is. They do care what fans think.

    Originally posted by longhorn
    Defender,the "Rat"(as they call it in Orlando) upper brass does not see the IRL as you it. I am sure they want it grow,but they are not willing to put much effort into it.
    I'm sure ABC appreciates your speaking on their behalf. If what you say is true, they should be fired immediately because if true, they would not deserve the rights. Look up the word 'partner' then suggest 'the rat' put it into practice.

  21. #21
    Future Insider
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Between the walls, just outside the groove
    Posts
    2,203
    I am at a loss for why ABC isn't doing a better job of promoting the most popular sport on the planet. They are hosting the World Cup... and the girls are treated like red-headed step children. Game after game, these girls produce the best soccer on the planet. When will the partner step up and market the product to the US audience more effectively?

    To waste the broadcast on just the Championship game would be idiotic... and that's being kind.

  22. #22
    Insider Truth Detector's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Rolling Lakes Yacht Club
    Posts
    45,483
    speedvis, the only fair comparison to the IRL & women's soccer is that the IRL cars frequently run two abreast.
    Center Grove Trojans
    2008 5A Football State Champs
    2011 Track State Champs

  23. #23
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    The fields I used to roam
    Posts
    15,454
    ...and IRL 'margins of victory' are not that large, either.


  24. #24
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    The fields I used to roam
    Posts
    15,454
    Originally posted by speedvis
    I am at a loss for why ABC isn't doing a better job of promoting the most popular sport on the planet. They are hosting the World Cup... and the girls are treated like red-headed step children. Game after game, these girls produce the best soccer on the planet. When will the partner step up and market the product to the US audience more effectively?

    To waste the broadcast on just the Championship game would be idiotic... and that's being kind.
    If womens soccer had invented the sport as we know it for the rest of the world in 1911, you might have a point.

    If womens soccer had people risking their lives with an unparalleled edge-of-the-seat excitement, you might have a point.

    If the Disney company was paying womens soccer over $20 million per year, you might have a point.

    But in reality, there is no comparison, and ESPN has even begun peeving their primary cash generation machine, the NFL.

    ABC and ESPN no longer provide the best sports coverage anywhere primarily because they have lost their focus, there is no visionary leadership, and they are out of money.

  25. #25
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    4,084
    Defender .... PLEASE for the milleniunth time.

    If it is such ABUSE and so BLATANTLY obvious that ABC/ESPN are not LIVING UP to their part of the CONTRACT, well then ... the IRL must have the worst lawyers on the planet.

    Either that, or Tony and company know they can't do much better on the open market right now. Don't ya think ??
    "There are 24 hours in a day, and 24 beers in a case. Coincidence?... I think not." - A wise fisherman

  26. #26
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Basement of the Temple in Salt lake City, Utah
    Posts
    351
    Will ABC/ESPN continue there relationshipwith the IRL when the current contract is up?

  27. #27
    Persona Non Grata
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Kansas City
    Posts
    12,187
    Originally posted by mesquite
    [BEither that, or Tony and company know they can't do much better on the open market right now. Don't ya think ?? [/B]
    The last thing they want is for this deal to go on the open market....
    "It was actually fun, because you're back fully driving again in these trucks. Ninety percent of the tracks we go to in the IRL, you're flat-out. I was having to lift off the corners some here." - Buddy Rice

  28. #28
    Paradoxically Sublime Turn13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Brownsburg, Indiana
    Posts
    30,886
    Blog Entries
    1
    Kinda shows some foresight in getting the deal locked down a while back, and the importance of leveraging the manufacturer ads.

  29. #29
    quality tool
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    undisclosed
    Posts
    1,911
    Trouble with Disney?

    Terminate their contract & re-negociate with other TV Networks!

  30. #30
    I don't see what is so bad about ABC/ESPN. Could their coverage be better? Sure it could but I'm happy I get to see all the IndyCar races. I'm glad ABC is paying $28+M/yr to the IRL/IMS because it goes a heck of a long way to keeping my favorite sport running.

    So what is the alternative? Should IndyCar racing do like CART and pay millions for TV broadcasting? I think not.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •