Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 31

Thread: Fox anounces record TV ratings

  1. #1
    Lowest Common Denominator
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Posts
    3,958

    Fox anounces record TV ratings

    From Jayski:

    UPDATE: Fox announced record-setting ratings for Cup events this year. Fox reported a 7% increase in ratings to a 6.0 from last season. Fox averaged 9.6 million viewers per race, about 600,000 more than last year. Seven races had record ratings this season: Daytona, California, Bristol, Talladega, Charlotte, Pocono and Sonoma.(News Record)(6-29-2005)
    Not the big percentage increases that the IRL is showing this year, but Fox seems happy.
    DVR . . . . Life is too short to watch commercials.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Baltimore Maryland
    Posts
    12,387
    good for NASCAR.. Glad i found something else to watch in place of Nascar.

  3. #3
    Registered User Jakester's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    12,829
    If you're offering cash,

    I'll take 7% of 9.6 million over 50% of 1 million most days.
    new sig pending

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    In a state of confusion
    Posts
    5,034
    I am a small part of that number.

    It's also interesting to note that since the Craftsman Truck Series races have been on Speed channel their ratings have increased year over year.

    I guess if you put things on that people want to see, the ratings will follow.

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    I oh way
    Posts
    303
    I wonder if Dale Jr. having a bad year has a bearing one way or the other? I would think that if he was in the top ten that ratings might possibly be even higher.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by jdessar
    It's also interesting to note that since the Craftsman Truck Series races have been on Speed channel their ratings have increased year over year.
    That is a bit odd, but understandable. CTS used to be on ESPN, even when the new TV package came out. However, I think they were so ticked off about losing the Cup package, they didn't give a darn about the CTS package. That was also when ESPN was having that battle where they gave up their credentials and wouldn't/couldn't broadcast from inside the track, or show highlights except for still photos (unless it was on the "news," aka Sportscenter). If I recall, they dumped the trucks over to ESPN2 and ignored it. So much so that SPEED bid to take it over. ESPN I remember, gave it to them a year early.

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,225
    And all without you-know-who.

    Outstanding job FOX!

  8. #8
    Lowest Common Denominator
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Posts
    3,958
    Quote Originally Posted by Ruok
    I wonder if Dale Jr. having a bad year has a bearing one way or the other? I would think that if he was in the top ten that ratings might possibly be even higher.
    As I recall, there were many bold predictions at the beginning of the year that the TV ratings would be down due to the races prior to the "Chase" wouldn't mean anything.

    More bold predictions of NASCAR's demise down the old toilet.

  9. #9
    Registered User Jim Wilke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Hanging on Robin's every word
    Posts
    42,626
    Blog Entries
    2
    For starters, the increase is only 7% and the last few races have not been blockbusters. Couple that with the possibility that some big names might miss 'The Chase' and we'll see what the season looks like when it is all over. As it stands right now, Jeff Gordon, Dale Jr. and Kenseth will miss 'The Chase'.

  10. #10
    Lowest Common Denominator
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Posts
    3,958
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Wilke
    For starters, the increase is only 7% and the last few races have not been blockbusters. Couple that with the possibility that some big names might miss 'The Chase' and we'll see what the season looks like when it is all over. As it stands right now, Jeff Gordon, Dale Jr. and Kenseth will miss 'The Chase'.
    As I recall, weren't you one of the people predicting that TV ratings would be down due to the races before the "Chase" not meaning anything?

  11. #11
    Lowest Common Denominator
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Posts
    3,958
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Wilke
    For starters, the increase is only 7% . . . . .
    I'm sorry, but this has to be the funniest statement I've read in a long time.

    How many sports/series these days are seeing increases in ratings?

    Only 7%

  12. #12
    Commissioner of Racing numrounofan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    The Commissioner’s Office
    Posts
    6,999
    Quote Originally Posted by Lee Roy
    As I recall, there were many bold predictions at the beginning of the year that the TV ratings would be down due to the races prior to the "Chase" wouldn't mean anything.

    More bold predictions of NASCAR's demise down the old toilet.
    Let's see how happy Fox is when it's time to write that check.....
    the man in expensive shoes

  13. #13
    Registered User Jim Wilke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Hanging on Robin's every word
    Posts
    42,626
    Blog Entries
    2
    Take the record ratings for the first few races out of the mix and I am right. Once the reality of 'The Chase' sunk in, ratings began to slip. And how did Sonoma set a record when the initial report said the rating was lower than a year ago? And how about this report:

    As Fox prepares to air its final Nextel Cup race of the season on Sunday, the network says it is on the verge of setting an all-time high for its regular season broadcasts. Fox says it is averaging a 6.1 rating and a 14 market share for its first 11 events (through the June 12 Pocono race) and 9.833 million viewers, according to Nielsen Media Research. The rating is up 5 percent from the 5.8 last year, and the audience is up 6 percent from the 2004 audience of 9.275 million. Fox Sports research expects that this year's Nextel Cup coverage on the network will post a final 5.9 household rating, setting a new record for any NASCAR package
    So prior to Sonoma, ratings were averaging 6.1 and up 5% and then we're told "Fox announced record-setting ratings for Cup events this year. Fox reported a 7% increase in ratings to a 6.0 from last season. Fox averaged 9.6 million viewers per race, about 600,000 more than last year."

    Now, the way I read this, the inclusion of Sonoma dropped the average from 6.1 to 6.0 - so how did the average go UP from 5% to 7%?

    My info came from here:

    Jayski

  14. #14
    Registered User Jim Wilke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Hanging on Robin's every word
    Posts
    42,626
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Lee Roy
    I'm sorry, but this has to be the funniest statement I've read in a long time.

    How many sports/series these days are seeing increases in ratings?

    Only 7%
    Well, for starters, I believe the IRL is up much more than 7% for the year and if you'll look over my previous post, I'm a bit curious about that 7% number.......

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Baltimore Maryland
    Posts
    12,387
    could it be total households?

  16. #16
    Registered User Jim Wilke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Hanging on Robin's every word
    Posts
    42,626
    Blog Entries
    2
    No, the headline says 'ratings increased 7%.'

    They averaged 5.8 last year and ended up at 6.0 this year. That's not an increase of 7% or 5% or even 4%. Something doesn't add up.

  17. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Baltimore Maryland
    Posts
    12,387
    my bad

  18. #18
    It's all good
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    חֵיפָה יִשְׂרָאֵל
    Posts
    5,597
    Fox averaged 9.6 million viewers per race, about 600,000 more than last year.
    9,600,000 / about 9,000,000 = about 1.06666.... or increase of: about 6.67%

    about 6.67% rounds to 7%

    Probably the "7% in ratings" was supposed to be "7% in viewers" or some such thing.
    "Being second is to be the first of the ones who lose." --- Ayrton Senna

  19. #19
    Lowest Common Denominator
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Posts
    3,958
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Wilke
    No, the headline says 'ratings increased 7%.'

    They averaged 5.8 last year and ended up at 6.0 this year. That's not an increase of 7% or 5% or even 4%. Something doesn't add up.
    It does look like you are correct. 5.8 to 6.0 is certainly not 7%.

    Oh well, it's still going up. I guess the bottom line will be when Fox writes the check.

  20. #20
    Lowest Common Denominator
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Posts
    3,958
    Quote Originally Posted by SLKRR
    9,600,000 / about 9,000,000 = about 1.06666.... or increase of: about 6.67%

    about 6.67% rounds to 7%

    Probably the "7% in ratings" was supposed to be "7% in viewers" or some such thing.
    Thanks. I wish I were smart.

  21. #21
    Persona Non Grata
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Kansas City
    Posts
    12,187
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Wilke
    Well, for starters, I believe the IRL is up much more than 7% for the year and if you'll look over my previous post, I'm a bit curious about that 7% number.......
    Of course, NASCAR's gain is over an all-time HIGH. The IRL's gain is over an all-time LOW (so it's not really a gain, just a recovery of some loss). And the total amount of added viewers that make up NASCAR's 7% gain is probably greater than the total number of people who have watched the IRL thus far this year.
    "It was actually fun, because you're back fully driving again in these trucks. Ninety percent of the tracks we go to in the IRL, you're flat-out. I was having to lift off the corners some here." - Buddy Rice

  22. #22
    Registered User Jim Wilke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Hanging on Robin's every word
    Posts
    42,626
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Lee Roy
    It does look like you are correct. 5.8 to 6.0 is certainly not 7%.

    Oh well, it's still going up. I guess the bottom line will be when Fox writes the check.
    So their ratings increase was actually half of what they claimed.............

    Oh, and most of this increase can be attributed to record numbers for the first 2 races; since late February, ratings are actually down......

    I'm sure this is good news.

  23. #23
    Registered User Jakester's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    12,829
    For starters, the increase is only 7%
    Well, for starters, I believe the IRL is up much more than 7% for the year
    As I said earlier, if you're handing me dollars, I'll take 7% of 9.6 million over 50% of 1 million most days.

    Even if the math is skewed,

    In dollars, I'd take 5% of 9.6 million over 20% of 1 million too.

  24. #24
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    The fields I used to roam
    Posts
    15,454
    Could one of the really smart people here please tell me how high the ratings will have to be for Fox to actually make a profit on this deal? Right now they are not. But hey, great ratings.

  25. #25
    the Driving Cat
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    2nd year Freshman, School for the re-Gifted
    Posts
    2,448
    Quote Originally Posted by Jakester
    As I said earlier, if you're handing me dollars, I'll take 7% of 9.6 million over 50% of 1 million most days.

    Even if the math is skewed,

    In dollars, I'd take 5% of 9.6 million over 20% of 1 million too.
    What is your 1 million supposed to represent or is it just made up for show.

    I thought the network rating point was roughly (rounded) equal to 1 million? So an average of 6 would be roughly 6 million, right? Darn you Newton and your new math!
    Last edited by Toonces; 06-30-2005 at 08:51 AM. Reason: math scares me
    "Rejoice in hope, be patient in suffering, persevere in prayer."
    Romans 12:12

  26. #26
    Lowest Common Denominator
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Posts
    3,958
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Wilke
    So their ratings increase was actually half of what they claimed.............

    Oh, and most of this increase can be attributed to record numbers for the first 2 races; since late February, ratings are actually down......

    I'm sure this is good news.
    For some unknown reason, FOX seems happy. I guess we'll have to wait and see what kind of check they write. That's when we'll know how good the news is.

  27. #27
    Lowest Common Denominator
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Posts
    3,958
    Quote Originally Posted by Defender
    Could one of the really smart people here please tell me how high the ratings will have to be for Fox to actually make a profit on this deal? Right now they are not. But hey, great ratings.
    The really smart people are the ones with the ability to sign the billion dollar contract. They seem to know the value.

  28. #28
    Lowest Common Denominator
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Posts
    3,958
    Quote Originally Posted by Racewriter
    The IRL's gain is over an all-time LOW . . . . . .
    Hey, that 100% increase from a 0.2 to a 0.4 can really make you patrickhappy if you're not careful.

  29. #29
    NASCAR ratings thread typing time could be saved if you would just number the posts.

    # 1 - NASCAR has high ratings.

    with the responses:

    # 2 - I hate NASCAR.

    # 3 - NASCAR isn't what it was in 19**.

    # 4 - Its all a bubble, its going to pop soon.

    # 5 - But Fox/NBC don't make money on the deal.

  30. #30
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,225
    Quote Originally Posted by SamC
    NASCAR ratings thread typing time could be saved if you would just number the posts.

    # 1 - NASCAR has high ratings.

    with the responses:

    # 2 - I hate NASCAR.

    # 3 - NASCAR isn't what it was in 19**.

    # 4 - Its all a bubble, its going to pop soon.

    # 5 - But Fox/NBC don't make money on the deal.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •